Skip to main content

Kelly urges EU leaders to prioritise agriculture  

MEP for Ireland South, Seán Kelly, has called for greater urgency in addressing what he has described as the ‘pressing issues plaguing the agriculture sector’.
MEP for Ireland South, Seán Kelly.

Speaking from the European Parliament in Strasbourg, the MEP for Ireland South, addressed President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. "In the upcoming Council meeting, leaders will deliberate on the challenges confronting our agriculture sector, and I cannot overstate the significance of this discussion,” he said.
He highlighted the extraordinary economic hardships endured by farmers in recent years, attributing them to various factors including the Covid-19 pandemic, energy price spikes, unfair international competition, and escalating inflation.
He continued: "The livelihoods of our farmers have been severely impacted by unprecedented economic challenges. It is imperative that we prioritise their well-being and resilience.”
Looking ahead to the formulation of the new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) and the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) for 2028-2034, Kelly urged leaders to elevate agriculture as a key political priority.
"The new CAP must include a robust economic pillar to ensure the viability of direct farm payments. Our farmers, who tirelessly provide for our communities, deserve unwavering support," he said. He also underscored the need for streamlined administrative processes and enhanced financial assistance to facilitate the transition to sustainable farming practices.
"We must alleviate unnecessary administrative burdens and provide adequate financial backing to support our farmers as they strive towards achieving net-zero emissions," he said.
He called for a deeper understanding of farmers' challenges within the European Commission, advocating for separate legal frameworks for agriculture and industrial emissions.
"It is essential to acknowledge the unique challenges faced by farmers. Having agriculture fall under the Industrial Emissions Directive does not make much sense. There should be two respective legal instruments. However, the Commissioner's commitment to addressing this disparity is welcomed.”